Moments in Paradise with Musar

by Julian Schultz
julian@oxfordwineroom.com

 

Friendly Discount Liquors’ pretty Patty Giannopoulos, endowed with the sauciest and merriest of eyes, remembered my fondness for Lebanon’s Chateau Musar. She said she remembered my telling her that I thought the 1994 vintage produced as fine a wine as I have ever tasted.

             A week ago came her e-mail: She will receive the 1996 vintage of this scarce and coveted wine in limited amount, to arrive in early August. I couldn’t reply fast enough to order three bottles. 

            Emboldened, now that I would have more magnificent Musar to enjoy, I decided to drink my remaining 1994 bottle. Had not the prospect of my obtaining the ‘96s been presented, surely I would have waited for deathbed time to take the ’94 and shuffle off this mortal coil, palate blessed in triumph and glory.

  In the cool, cool, cool of my cellar, I carefully cradled this treasure after removing it from its horizontal rack. I put it upright for a day and had my caregiver/food shopper/housekeeper/consummate cook shop for steaks in quantity enough to afford three evenings of dining with the ’94 Musar.

             Oh, paradise! The ’94 had me gasping with incredulity, better than when -- and since -- I had tasted it at a 12-vintages -- ’66 to ’94 -- Musar tasting at the Castle. In my over 50 years of drinking wine, I can’t recall experiencing such euphoria – almost gleefully shouted to myself. Never have I tasted such astounding complexity of rich luscious fruit, perfection of balance in acid, tannin and texture, smoothness in swallow and length of aftertaste.

 Without trepidation, I assert: The ’94s stand tall with Classified Growth Bordeaux, Cru Classé Burgundy and unexcelled Rhone greats. At the vertical 12-red wines tasting, 18 experienced tasters rated the ’94 highest with a consensus score of 92; the range from 85 to 97. I rated it 92 then; today I would rate it 96 without hesitation. 

 My notes: “exquisite interactive flavors of dried cherries, ripe plum, dark chocolate, cedar, autumn woodland spice, beef, mushrooms and smoke. A Chateauneuf-du-Pape replica?” 

Second evening, I discerned soft oak, currants, coffee, gentle tannin and velvety mouthfeel, which in my exuberance I was oblivious to on the first evening.

             With impatient anticipation, I hurried through two late afternoon fitness exercise routines to taste again my Musar’s last eight and eight ounces with the steaks – and would savor them slowly by contrast to the rapidly performed punishing exercises. After the last eight-ounce pour of Musar and last steak portion were gone, I came the sickening realization that I had no more ’94. I desperately needed to know that I could taste again this particular vintage, especially as Patty’s e-mail advised that the ’96 vintage might be a lighter, more delicate, comparatively feminine bottling of the Musar – humm, more like Bordeaux’ Margaux elegance, I

thought. “Finesse,” I believe Patty described it in conjunction with other adjectives.

             I worried, where might I find and buy more ‘94s of this rare, scarce, coveted connoisseur’s wine? Dismally and without hope, I e-mailed Patty. Perchance did she

 possibly, miraculously, foresightedly have some ‘94s stashed away in her and husband Bill’s office? I have been in that sanctum sanctorum and observed the binned treasures they had sequestered for wine connoisseurs who so fanatically seek to taste and possess such finest of wines that they disdain practicing price prudence in the preservation of their purses. 

            Two days later…yes! She had some ‘94s and would add three bottles to my ‘96s when the latter arrived. Halleluyah! I am thankful that Bill and Patty Giannopoulos had attended the vertical tasting and were astute enough to recognize the merit of the ’94; Bill bought as much supply as was available to him. (As of the time you read this column, and after my three, Friendly has only three 94s remaining, with no more available.)

             So what causes the uniqueness of Chateau Musar from Lebanon’s war torn Bekaa Valley, a relatively obscure viticulture region, fraught for centuries with social, political and military instability? What is so different about this wine? Why do savvy connoisseurs snap up this wine wherever, whenever, available? 

            I met Serge Hochar, co-owner and Bordeaux oenology educated winemaker, at the Castle’s vertical tasting of his wines. He discussed his wines, enlightening us with facts about them:

 ·        Vines grown on high 3000 feet elevation, obtain 300 days of sunshine a year at 77 friendly degrees temperature.

·        Lebanese wines date back to the Phoenicians, predating the Romans by centuries.

·        Musar is indisputably Lebanon’s first growth and the product of 25 to 60 year old vines.

·        Musar is released only after seven years of vintage date.

·        Red wine blend: approximately one-third each of cabernet sauvignon, carignane and cinsault with small amounts of syrah, mourvedre and grenache.

·        It is an interesting adventuresome wine. From year to year one never knows what a Musar will deliver: One year it may be cabernet sauvignon dominant and will resemble at Medoc; in another year, if the wine happens to be syrah, carignane, grenache, mourvedre and cinsault accented, it could taste like a Chateauneuf-du-Pape.

·        Anomaly: Musar, despite its light- to medium-red color, surprisingly hits hard with arresting, vigorous flavor and firm tannin and may improve to 20 years.

·        The wine may smell like Burgundy/Rhone spice and taste like Bordeaux.

·        Connoisseurs who impatiently wait seven years for its release refer to it as “the seven-year itch.”

 Two years ago, Dr. Bob Ouellette, having long been an aficionado of Musar, wanted to introduce the wine to his Worcester Wine Tasters group; the setting had to be appropriate to Musar’s pedigree and prestige. He selected the gourmet Castle Restaurant, where master sommelier Jim Nicas would be entrusted to prepare and pour the wines, matching them with the inimitable Castle food.

We had also two extremely rare whites – the ’95 and ’96 vintages.

 Bob had written a brief recap of the event for our WWT group; it is worthy of repeating here:

 “The whites were a revelation to many of us. The ’95 vintage had depth of flavor, orchestrated with a very long- and long to be remembered finish. Mouthfilling spicy nuttiness contrasted with the flavor sensation of marzipan, apricots and honey.

 “When it came to the 12 reds…even as some vintages were scored higher than others by the attendees, there was a common thread among the wines that made differences negligible. The older years were remarkable by the still steadfast ripeness of the fruit, and they were followed with nuances of barnyard and meaty aromas, so characteristic of Hochar’s reds.

 “Extremely interesting was the order of the tasting. Jim Nicas prepared the wines in groups of similarity of vintages rather than by chronological year. This gave us the opportunity to compare older wines with newer ones based on vintage characteristics. One could easily imagine how the more recent vintages would develop based on this tasting. Consequently, since the ’94 was the only one available now, I think that several tasters headed for the phone post haste to call their preferred wine store (or ordered some then and there from Friendly Discount Liquors). 

“Truly it was a remarkable, educational and fun-filled afternoon that will long be remembered.”

 Remarkable, indeed: The scores of each vintage -- from ’66 to ’94 -- ranged from the mid 80s into the mid 90s; six were awarded 95s. And the oldest of them, the ’66, hit a high of 97. So…hypothesis: If the range of scores of all previous 12 vintages that we tasted was so high, may we not assume that the untried 1996 vintage likewise will merit a score within that range?

 Tip: Don’t wait. Gather ye Chateau Musar while ye may, old time keeps aflying, and the Musar so delicious today, tomorrow if you delay will leave you regretfully sighting. (Well, I have massacred Robert Herrick’s lines in the interests of urging you to contact Friendly Discount Liquors’ pretty Patty – she with the sauciest and merriest of eyes, and do yourself a favor: Order the ‘96 and ’94 – assuming the latter is still available. Of course, you may order them from hubby Bill Giannopoulos, who buys them, but he lacks Patty’s charisma. So, I ordered mine from Patty at the 20 percent pre-sell discount price of $31.99.) 

Wine Pick: A bargain from Australia at around $15: Reynolds Merlot 2001, blended with 13 percent Cabernet Sauvignon and 2 percent Shiraz for flavor, complexity and longevity. Detect aromas of ripe red berries, pebbly earth and dried herbs/spices; palate: lush red berries, intriguing sweet oak, balancing black pepper and soft but firm tannins are added to aromas transferred to the palate; smooth texture, silky swallow and reluctant farewell. Highly recommended.

 Wine Pick: Bonny Doon Vin Gris de Cigare 2002, around $10. Another Bonny Doon beauty! Exquisitely blended with Rhone varietals of Marsanne, Grenache, Syrah and Mourvedre – and its price is RIGHT. Big-fruited aromas of strawberry, rose and lime transfer to the palate and add to rich lush fruit, nutty/toasty wood, balancing black pepper, varied spices and herbs; velvety, creamy mouthfeel leave a pleasant aftertaste.

 Wine Pick: A must: Terra d’Oro Zinfandel Home Vineyard 2000, around $24.  Opulent elegance graces the wine glass and rewards the zin aficionado with a riot of luscious wild berry fruit, plums and raisins, augmented with toasty wood, black pepper and underlaid with nuances of spice and tar. This is a Zinfandel’s Zinfandel – the epitome of this itinerant grape varietal: “wandered” to our West Coast from Italy? The Balkans? Southeastern United States? Aw, who cares where it came from as long as the wine pleases the palate… and it will! 

Wine Pick: Wolffer Estate Rosé 2002, around $12.50. For a non-Rosé fancier – namely me – my sipping this delicate wine was a serendipitous mouth-gaping revelation. With all escape routes closed, either I drank the Rosé or went without wine. I drank the wine…and I loved it! This salmon colored fruit laden summer picnic wine was dry and elegant and refreshing with an abundance of lively balancing acidity, berry fruit – blackberries, cherries, currants – and zesty citrus with hints of roses and mint. Not imposing or overpowering, rather restrained and well mannered, this Rosé will delight the newcomer to wine as well as the connoisseur.

              

Email Comments to Julian at:
julian@oxfordwineroom.com