Love Is Everywhere At The Webster House

by Julian Schultz
julian@oxfordwineroom.com

      

Webster House post-Valentine’s Day wine dinner was…unique! That means it was one of a kind, rare, unequalled: a wine dinner with six courses subtly infused with…chocolate! In my 51 years of cavorting with food and wine, this experience was a first. And…what…a…first!

The wines by association with the food were so delicately finessed by the taste of the food that if you didn’t know about the chocolate…you wouldn’t know about the chocolate, as Yogi Bera might say.

Dissent?Nary a squeak of disapproval; instead enthusiastic accolades: “A brave new world of gourmet dining,” “Shangri-La at the table!” “This chocolate-y food dinner is a dinner to end all dinners!”

“Who needs to schlep to Boston, who needs to trek to Providence?” “Imagination, innovation, inspiration, individuality – Webster House’s Joan St. Denis Clarico is her name.” Similar paeans of praise for the dinner were voiced throughout the evening.

All 55 of us had romance in our eyes and love in our hearts. Our palates throbbed with the anticipation romantic chocolate-kissed six food courses and six especially selected wines for chocolate mating.

At the trial dinner, the tuna and the lamb chop dishes were rejected for being incompatible with both chocolate and wine.

To plan a wine dinner accented with chocolate and wedded to tannic red wines – Sirah, Merlot, Pinot Noir -- required a devil-may-care cavalier’s derring-do -- some of us thought -- derangement! by Webster House’s Chris Liazos. But as Shakespeare wrote: “All’s Well That Ends Well.” And, indeed, not only did the dinner end well…it ended sensationally, judging from the enthusiasm of the food and wine combinations on our palates.

Chris introduced me to Rex Ridgeworth, from Bangor, Maine, a first timer at these monthly wine dinners. I invited him to join our table. He smiled sadly it seemed, saying that he had asked Chris to seat him alone.

Responding to my questioning stare, he said: “For years, celebrating Valentine’s Day, my late wife and I had dinner at different restaurants. I always arranged in advance for the chefs to prepare a dessert with dark bittersweet chocolate for her. She loved dark bittersweet chocolate, but she was not a chocoholic – deferring to her svelte figure…By the way, I know you are a wine writer -- I read you on the Oxford Wine Room website. And Chris tells me you used to teach wine appreciation. I, too, am a wine writer; I write twice a month for the local newspaper. Perhaps we can talk sometime before dessert.”

I agreed, saying I’d enjoy exchanging thoughts on writing about wine for the public -- some of whom know little, others much, about the eloquent beverage. He congratulated me on the “eloquent beverage metaphor” (somewhat patronizing, I thought).

We sat together through the first two courses before he returned to the small table that was in a corner.

First course: four seared large tender scallops over a salad of mesclun greens with light shaved white chocolate in a perfecting balsamic reduction. Unique? You bet it was! This novel taste buds experience evoked spirited, enthusiastic comment that elevated the decibel level and made casual conversation difficult. Who cared! We were too busy enjoying the food and wine for idle chitchat.

Elk Grove Pinot Gris 2002, Oregon, $12.79, after O’Hara’s Discount Liquors’ Jim Vasiiiadis’ generous 20 percent discount, accompanied the first course. (All prices shown are at 20 percent discount.)

Elk Grove Pinot Gris tiptoed shyly to the nose, but became a graceful prima ballerina on the palate with its fruit of peaches, pineapple, melon; its firm, clean, crisp accompaniments perfectly balanced wine; smooth swallow and medium-to-long aftertaste made this rich wine a 125/100 price value. I observed proffered wine glasses for refills – including mine -- when wait staff of Lynn Beardsley and Ann Robert, assisted by Jim Vasiliadis and Chris Liazos extended the wine bottles to us.

Second course: Mexican beef soup – deliciously thick as a stew – consisting of thick cubes of tender beef, orange zest, fresh cumin, chili powder, diced tomato and smiling chocolate danced a spirited tarantella with Whitehall Lane Merlot.

WhiteHall Lane Merlot 2000, $19.99: soft nose, but a palate-full of plums, cherries, berries with toasty oak; finished with balanced fruit acids, firm tannins and smooth texture; moderate to long aftertaste. Despite price, a 100/100 price value.

Rex: “Well, Julian, we certainly have one facet about writing in common: We both rate wines by price value -- not by numbers, alphabet, stars, asterisks, or whatever.

“Obviously, we can’t all agree on which wine is better than another, or worth more, but that doesn’t change the premise that choosing the best wine for the price is the way wine should be bought, or recommended by us wine writers. This is no less true for the casual customer than for the professional. The idea is to get the most value for your money. I refuse to buy well-made wines that are just too expensive for its quality.

“You once illustrated this idea in a wine column; it went something like this: A man spread his arms far apart, holding up two bottles of wine. He said, ‘This is the difference in price between these two bottles.’ He brought his arms close together, saying: ‘and this is the difference in quality. It costs a lot less to get very little less in quality.’ ”

Third course: coconut battered gargantuan-size shrimp in a white chocolate liqueur with a kiss of orange juice, augmented with steamed vegetables and brown rice pilaf, was escorted by sweet white wine Schneider “Niersteiner Hipping” Auslese 2002, $14.39 – bunches of very ripe grapes, late picked, and beautifully rich with lush, fruit-acids and exquisitely balanced. I noted immediately a stone fruits variety, especially peaches, and a smack of ginger, flowing over my taste buds. Price value: 150/100.

Wine and shrimp were perfection! Outstanding! I mused, however, about the wine’s being positioned in mid-dinner, between two reds – the Shiraz yet to follow. Later with my initial taste of the big Shiraz, I immediately went to water and chewy bread to neutralize my palate. Then all was well with the world…and my palate.

When Dr. Bob Ouellette, now bathing in sunny Florida, reported to me about the trial dinner at which, unfortunately, I was absent, he said the shrimp course, the Mexican beef stew and the veal pleased him most.

Fourth course: cocoa-coffee-crusted spiced chicken with tomato, avocado, and chocolate chips salsa. In one word: De…licious!

Kirralaa Shiraz 2002, $11.99, a jolting abrupt change from the diametrically opposite sweet Auslese, was right on target with the spiced chicken. A Rosemount/Robert Mondavi enterprise, the Shiraz disclosed big fruit and balancing assertive tannin. “Too young, needs time,” I wrote. Upon reflection, I further noted, “Should never have followed the Auslese!” A better wine than what it showed, still price-valued 115/100. I would like to taste it again it in a different food menu context.

An, “Oh, wow!” course: seared veal with brown meat-based sauce, given pizzazz with delectable chocolate and Meyer dark rum infusion, completed with duchesse potato and steamed tender, tiny broccolini.

The Whitehorse Pinot Noir 2000, $17.59, married well with its cherries/berries spicy fruit, easy fruit acids and tannin balance; not a Burgundy pinot noir, but OK enough for a West Coast version. 100/100 price value. To nit pick: I would have preferred the Pinot Noir instead of the Shiraz with the chicken and the Shiraz substituted with the veal.

Chocoholics were in heaven with the dessert course: platter filling variety of chocolate petit fours truffles from Prifti Candies, chocolate manufactures and retailers, located on Green St., Worcester. Even I, who never eat candy, ashamedly succumbed to seconds, thirds, fourths…..Nick Prifti reminded me how I used to buy dark chocolate pecan bark for my late and beloved Lillian.

Accompanying wine: Domaine La Tour Vieille (Banyul) 2001, $15.99, 500 mg. bottle…and worth every cent. Truly a magnificent complex dessert wine from Banyuls, France, its fermentation stopped at about a sweet 8 percent, infused with brandy from its own grapes leaving about 15.5 percent alcohol, was not overly sweet; its fruit was reminiscent of prunes, raisins, and chocolate.

Len Presutti, corporate wine educator of Martignetti Companies, and wine host, referred to the wine as, “The best wine in the world with chocolate.” Amen.

Our table consisted of Debbie Zachariewicz, professional chef; her mother Linda, my caregiver, shopper, cook, and chief worrier about me – next to Dr. Bob; Cheryl Orrico, manager of the Worcester Chapter of Elks; Buzzie Martin, a carefree wine connoisseur; and Adele Wheeler of Dudley, an ingratiating and blushing sweet connoisseur of good food. All of us praised the dinner as the best one ever, as did other guests; a happy departure from commonplace dining, albeit fine wine dinners at the Webster House and other fine restaurants.

As the fifth course wine was being poured, Rex caught my eye and beckoned to me. I joined him.

“You must find it odd that I prefer to sit alone,” he said. “I just feel that I would be disloyal to Clarissa’s memory if I didn’t confine my thoughts entirely to her at this particular dinner on Valentine’s Day.…You know, Julian, she was some kind of beauty. She had a mouth like a pomegranate of red, cut in twain with a knife of ivory, and an idyllic face of lily beauty with sparkling eyes of cloudless blue.”

I replied: “Happy are you, and you alone; you who can call this dinner – yours and hers -- your own; you who secure within yourself can say: ‘Fortune do your worst for I have lived today; be fair, or foul, or rain, or shine; the joys that I have known in spite of fate are mine alone; not heaven itself upon the past has power…for what has been has been…and I have had my hour.’ ”

Rex, nodded: “You would know; you have been through it, Chris says.”

We chatted over the veal course, discussing writing and annoying copy editors. I told him about my beloved Lillian: She had been an editor in high school and college – school newspapers, yearbooks and creative writing publications -- and had been my editor, but she was never annoying.”

Rex smiled: Yes, you write frivolously Julian. Usually, your columns make me laugh.”

I was slightly annoyed: “Well, I may write frivolously, but I don’t live frivolously – quite to the contrary. My personality in my writing is a persona, sort of an alter ego; I am really a conservative and private person. Anyway, this was her advice to me on writing:

“No dangling participles! They must relate to the subject that follows…

“Keep your sentences short to ensure comprehension and to prevent readers’ impatience…

“Above all: clarity, clarity, clarity. If the sentence is awkward or vague, revise, revise, revise. Don’t force it. Break it into two sentences

“Don’t try to impress readers with long words, or words they may not understand. You are seeking to communicate. If readers don’t understand, you aren’t communicating…

“If you -- with your extensive vocabulary – need to look up a definition of an uncommon word -- don’t use it! Keep your writing comprehensible by keeping it simple…

“Be conscious of redundancies…weak modifiers…superfluous beginnings…hedging words… time and sequence words…non-essentials…overwriting -- think about cutting to shorten…don’t over-punctuate – it stops the reader.” She made me sit down, pay attention as she explained, and convince her that I understood…

“Revise, and after you have revised, revise again and perhaps revise one more time. Then let me see it!!!!!!!” She never took anything for granted…

“What you think you wrote isn’t always what you wrote. So reread carefully…

“The word you see as you reread isn’t always there. So reread your sentences slowly and carefully…

“And for heaven’s sale, dear, don’t be pretentious or pompous and don’t try to be cute. That doesn’t mean, however, your writing shouldn’t be colorful, and original and unique and an expression of your personality…

“It’s OK to take little liberties with facts, or with events, to tell the truth better or more interestingly…

Be conscious of rhythm and cadence. Your words should flow gracefully, not stop, stutter and start.”

When I returned home from the dinner, I read the e-mail from Dr. Bob Ouellette, loyal friend: “I wasn’t there looking over your shoulder to make sure you weren’t over eating and over drinking…because I wouldn’t let you. I am anxious to read your report on the dinner.”

I e-mailed back: “Your advice comes too late. I ate everything and drank everything completely, even refills of some wines. Couldn’t – nor did I want to – resist. Now I am miserable about my lack of discipline and am wallowing in regret.”

Dr. Bob’s e-mail came today. I won’t repeat what he said.

Kudos: Joan St. Denis Clarico, chef; John Hammerstrom, sous chef; waitstaff, Lynn Beardsley and Ann Robert; Len Presutti and O’Hara’s wine purveyor Jim Vasiliadis; and owner/mine host, the inimitable Chris Liazos.

Next wine dinner: Spanish wines and food, Wednesday, March 24, 6 p.m. Avoid being refused seating because of late reservation. Reserve now: 508-757-7208. See you there.

Wine Pick: Montevina Zinfandel Sierra Foothills 2001, around $11. A charming, delicate, kinder, gentler zin. The tannins are soft and the zin is easily approachable: a zin for newcomers to wine and for connoisseurs who prefer something with plenty of sweet cherry fruit, lower alcohol and a gentler structure. Enthusiastically recommended with lighter fare.

Wine Pick: R.H. Phillips Toasted Head Chardonnay 2002, around $17. This beauty has everything going for it: apples, varied citrus aromas and flavors, hints of cinnamon and clove spices. Back taste of pears, light oak, vanilla and caramel lead to a smooth finish and delicious aftertaste.

Email Comments to Julian at:
julian@oxfordwineroom.com